Well-read Democratic candidate for U.S. House Tim Bjorkman wittily dismisses the Trump/Noem tax plan as horse-and-sparrow economics.
But problem-solver Bjorkman also tells WNAX what tax reform we should do instead:
The middle class and the lower middle class who are out there working our jobs and fighting our wars, they need a tax break, and the best way to stimulate the economy is to put more money in their hands… because the one thing the middle class does is they spend most all of their money back into the economy, and that’s something that isn’t going to happen if we return to the kind of trickle-down economics that the Bush Administration last brought us, which led to the Great Recession with a sluggish decade economically… [Tim Bjorkman, in “SD Congressional Candidate Doesn’t Like Tax Cut Plan,” WNAX, 2017.11.28].
Now if Congress were really after economic stimulus, we’d be focusing on increasing spending, not cutting taxes, because, as we learned in the Great Recession, food stamps, unemployment benefits, infrastructure investments, and aid to state governments all provide more economic juice per dollar than tax cuts. But if tax cuts are all the Trump Congress is willing to do, then Bjorkman is right: cutting the top rates for the rich don’t have any predictable effect on economic growth.
Or should I say Bjorkman is Reich—Robert Reich:
The answer [to the anemic recovery from the Great Recession] is in front of our faces. It’s because American consumers, whose spending is 70 percent of economic activity, don’t have the dough to buy enough to boost the economy – and they can no longer borrow like they could before the crash of 2008….
All of the gains from economic growth have been going to the richest 1 percent – who, because they’re so rich, spend no more than half what they take in.
Can I say this any more simply? The earnings of the great American middle class fueled the great American expansion for three decades after World War II. Their relative lack of earnings in more recent years set us up for the great American bust [Robert Reich, “Why the Economy Can’t Get out of First Gear,” blog, 2012.06.12].
In 2012, Reich called for a much broader scheme of wealth de-concentration than mere middle-class tax cuts to bring the consumer-driven economy back to full strength. But he agrees with Bjorkman that a tax plan offering permanent and feckless tax breaks to the richest and eventual tax hikes to the middle and lower classes is the opposite of what we need to do.
How refreshing it will be to have a Democratic Congressman who grounds his discussion of tax policy in proven economic facts instead of the fantasies our current Snow Queen Congresswoman peddles.
OUTSTANDING!!
But … but …. but …. rich people …..
One thought I had about tax cuts for the middle class is that it assumes a middle class. What seems to be happening is an assault on the middle class – not only in tax policy but in far more directly destructive actions. How can we seriously talk about preserving our middle class, the real driver of American growth and success, while destroying the jobs and institutions that create that class? Basic questions about who really benefits from automation and efficiency; who really benefits from the destruction of the labor unions; who really benefits from increased college/tech school tuitions . . .?
Every dollar is a zero-sum game decision: a moral decision.
Tax cuts should be for the middle class. The economy grows from the middle up, but with wages being stagnant for 30 years it’s only a short spurt and not long term. The deficit is dangerously high for more spending . One of the things that would really help is allowing people to pool their unemployment benefits into a worker owned co op . This would create local employment that would always be in the community and provide a living wage. Give them a little start up tech help and in return they pay a very small fee to keep the service available to the next co op.