You know that when its rainy, snowy, or icy, you should drive more slowly. But for the knuckleheads who can’t figure that out, the Department…
Day: January 12, 2020
The SDGOP spin blog is complaining that that Sioux Falls paper has editorialized that raising some taxes on rich people would be good for South…
Downtown Sioux Falls and the South Dakota Cattlemen’s Foundation are sponsoring the Seventh Annual Downtown Burger Battle. (The Cattlemen’s Foundation website only mentions the 2018…
Check out other reporters’ takes on my successful court challenge to 2019 HB 1094: Anna Peters, “Judge Rules South Dakota Petition Gathering Law Unconstitutional,” KELO-TV,…
“It’s a bad day for the rule of law in South Dakota,” whimpers Representative Jon Hansen, as if, as Trumpists like to claim, a Constitutional exercise of checks and balances against overreach by one branch of government is really some extralegal coup.
The U.S. District Court ruling Friday overturning Hansen’s 2019 House Bill 1094 did make for a bad day, not for the rule of law, but for the unchecked rule of lawmakers like Hansen who crave absolute power and hold in contempt the voters and their First Amendment rights.
[I proceed now into heavy quoting of a legal ruling, which itself is rife with quotes within quotes and complicated legal citations. I omit the judge’s internal citations and simply put any text I take from the ruling in quote marks (for short passages) or blockquotes (for longer passages). To see whether the words come from Judge Kornmann or from cases he cited, please see his original document.]
Judge Charles Kornmann makes clear from the first page of his ruling in SD Voice v. Noem II that he acts with the utmost respect for the law and the proper place of the judiciary in evaluating it: