Skip to content

Pen Pen: America’s Self-Inflicted Crisis of Fatherlessness

In his latest essay from the South Dakota Penitentiary, Samuel Lint, Inmate #16334, asks how we break the cycle of fatherlessness that incarceration makes worse:

America is facing a fatherlessness crisis. Politicians, commentators, and community leaders routinely point to the devastating effects of absent fathers: increased poverty, lower educational attainment, higher rates of behavioral problems, substance abuse, and greater involvement with the criminal justice system. They are not wrong. The evidence is clear that stable, engaged parents are one of the strongest protective factors a child can have.

What is rarely discussed, however, is how decades of public policy have actively contributed to the very problem many leaders now lament.

For generations, politicians have competed to appear tougher on crime than their opponents. Sentences grew longer. Mandatory minimums expanded. Nonviolent drug offenses were met with years—or even decades—behind bars. Mental illness was increasingly criminalized rather than treated. Prisons filled with people whose greatest need was often healing, treatment, education, and accountability—not simply punishment.

The result has been predictable.

Millions of parents, particularly fathers, have been removed from their homers and communities. Their children have grown up with empty seats at birthday parties, school conferences, sporting events, graduations, and dinner tables. Yet rather than examining how our policies contributed to this reality, we often focus solely on the symptoms.

The conversation becomes, “Why aren’t fathers around?” instead of, “Why have we built systems that make family separation a routine outcome?”

At the heart of this issue lies something even deeper than incarceration: unresolved trauma.

Addiction is often not the root problem. It is the symptom.

Many people enter adulthood carrying grief, loss, abuse, neglect, abandonment, and trauma that they have never been taught to process. We do not teach most children how to mourn. We do not teach them how to heal. We do not teach them how to navigate life’s inevitable heartbreaks, setbacks, and disappointments in healthy ways.

Instead, many learn to numb the pain rather than confront it.

Some turn to alcohol. Others to drugs. Some self-destruct quietly. Others act out publicly. Eventually, many encounter the criminal justice system.

Children who were never taught emotional regulation become adults who struggle with emotional regulation. Children who never witnessed healthy coping mechanisms become adults who lack healthy coping mechanisms. Young people who were never given tools to succeed are often punished for failing without ever being taught how to succeed in the first place.

Then they become parents.

Without intervention, the cycle repeats itself.

A father enters prison. His child grows up without him. The child experiences trauma, instability, and loss. The child struggles in school, relationships, and emotional development. Years later, that child may encounter the same systems that removed the child’s parent. Another generation is lost.

Meanwhile, prisons often provide little meaningful trauma recovery, grief counseling, family reunification work, or evidence-based healing services. We remove people from society, warehouse them for years, and then express surprise when many return carrying the same unresolved issues they had upon entry.

The public pays for this failure repeatedly.

We pay through increased crime. We pay through higher incarceration costs. We pay through lost economic productivity. We pay through broken families, overwhelmed social services, and communities struggling to recover from generation after generation of instability.

More importantly, children pay the price.

The irony is hard to ignore. Many of the same political leaders who correctly identify fatherlessness as a major social problem often support policies that do little to address its underlying causes. Recognizing a problem is important. Solving it requires something more.

If we are serious about reducing fatherlessness, we must be equally serious about reducing the conditions that produce it.

That means expanding mental health treatment before crises become crimes. It means treating addiction as a public health issue while still demanding accountability. It means investing in grief and trauma recovery programs. It means strengthening families rather than merely punishing their failures. It means preparing incarcerated parents to return home as healthier fathers, mothers, and community members.

None of this requires abandoning personal responsibility. In fact, reducing fatherlessness demands personal responsibility.

Accountability and rehabilitation are not opposing ideas. They are partners.

A justice system that only punishes creates revolving doors. A justice system that punishes while also healing creates opportunities for transformation.

America’s fatherlessness crisis did not emerge overnight, and it will not be solved overnight. But if we continue to ignore the connections between trauma, addiction, incarceration, and family separation, we will continue producing the very outcomes we claim to oppose.

The question is not whether fatherlessness is harming America. The question is whether we are finally willing to address the policies and conditions that help create it. Until we do, we will remain trapped in a cycle of our own making—arresting not only individuals, but the development of entire generations.

[Samuel Lint, Inmate #16334, South Dakota Penitentiary, postmarked 2026.06.20; edited by CA Heidelberger, Dakota Free Press.]

Related Reading:

6 Comments

  1. O

    I would propose we go even one level deeper in causality to look at how economics – specifically poverty – lead to the social ills Lint delineates. For the poor, the only option for punishment is to take away time.

  2. O’s point about the role of economics/poverty in exacerbating fatherlessness poses a huge challenge to the Governor’s rehab/recidivism task force: can that group reach beyond its expected purview and suggest economic policies that might prevent separating families in the first place?

    We call the folks running the prisons “Department of Corrections”. How often might we “correct” offenders’ behavior without separating them from their families and making things worse for their children?

  3. This interested party has covered Republican-driven domestic violence even before incel Jared Loughner shot Gabby Giffords at a Safeway in Tucson in part because he believed women shouldn’t hold power. According to his acquaintances he quit using teevee but was already radicalized by commercial media and by odious anti-feminist entertainer, Rush Limbaugh.

    Donald Trump’s pathologically narcissistic obsession with the boob tube has certainly warped his humanity and the phantasmagorical channels he surfs are virulent and toxic, too. This is one reasonEarth haters like Reich Mike Rounds want to abolish the Department of Education. “Something is going on with America’s boys. In every single U.S. state, men are less likely than women to earn a bachelor’s degree. But that educational achievement gap begins much, much earlier. By the time they’re just 8 years old, boys are nearly half a grade behind girls.” Falling Behind: Do we treat boys like malfunctioning girls?

  4. Ben

    “Do we treat boys like malfunctioning girls?” I’ve worked with kids most of my life. Personally, I’m more academicly inclined. I tend to be a rule follower. I’m introverted. I’m competitive, but given my size, didn’t get too involved with organized sports. As a educator/childcare worker, girls are easier to work with for me. When it comes to temperament, I can relate to them more. So boys have often posed more of a challenge for me and can give credence to the idea of there being a tendency to treat boys like “malfunctioning girls” in spaces where their temperament isn’t as well suited. Maybe Corey can comment on his experiences as an educator as well?

  5. O

    Our public schools more-and-more are the real “departments of corrections”; any institution intervening after that in a person’s life is just punitive punishment.

  6. South Dakota’s school to prison pipeline accelerated in 1983 when Republican Governor Bill Janklow converted the University of South Dakota at Springfield into a prison; then his people killed Gina Score in a boot camp, ended environmental protection and drove the red moocher state’s descent into the hellish chemical toilet it is today.

    As of June 30, 2025 there were 1,709 children in South Dakota’s child welfare system and 1,201 (70%) of them were Indigenous Americans. Today, the Lakota People’s Law Project, NDN Collective and other Indigenous organizations seek foster families and homes because SD Department of Social Services employees in Rapid City flout the Indian Child Welfare Act. Since South Dakota receives some $80,000 from the federal government for each child the state seizes about 750 American Indian kids every year reaping well over a billion federal dollars since ICWA was enacted and radicalizes yet another generation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *