Skip to content

Sioux Falls Petitioners Seek Referendum on Rezoning for Data Center

Ignore public opinion, get a referendum!

The Sioux Falls City Council voted 7–0 Tuesday to rezone about a quarter section of land from agricultural to light industrial to accommodate a hyperscale data center proposed by California developer Michael Anvar under the flag of Gemini Data Center SD LLC. The irregular tract sits between Sioux Falls and Brandon in between the curves of Veterans Parkway and Six Mile Road, below East Rice Street.

Sioux Falls City Council, map of proposed data center site, from rezoning ordinance draft, city council documents, 2026.01.06.
Sioux Falls City Council, map of proposed data center site, from rezoning ordinance draft, city council documents, 2026.01.06.

Residents testified for over five hours, overwhelmingly against the rezoning. The council saw no merit in this opposition and cleared the way for God-knows-who to put a Colossus/Skynet station in Minnehaha County. Enter John Connor—I mean, Samantha Scarlata:

Following the Sioux Falls city council’s unanimous approval of rezoning land to allow a data center on Rice Street near Veterans Parkway, Samantha Scarlata filed paperwork to bring it to an election.

“Bringing the vote to the community so they can decide for themselves,” said Scarlata.

…Scarlata is concerned that the will of the people may not have been reflected in the city council approval.

“That was something that is important to the community, that they would take into consideration how the community is feeling about it,” said Scarlata [Beth Warden, “Petition Drive Could Bring Data Center to Public Vote,” KSFY, 2026.01.09].

Scarlata announced her candidacy for an at-large seat on the City Council in November.

Also petitioning is Amanda Kendal:

One of the people who was at the city council meeting on Wednesday was Amanda Kendal, who was out in front of the Minnehaha County Administration building Friday looking for signatures that would take the council’s decision to a vote.

Kendal is with the group Let Sioux Falls Vote who is seeking to take the city council’s rezoning decision to a vote.

…Kendal said the group has already seen a couple hundred people out already to sign petitions.

“Today was the first day that we were able to go out and actually even apply and get the petition like officialized and now we have 20 days to collect our goal is 10,000 signatures,” Kendal said. “That’s why we’re trying to promote petition circulation as much as we are just so we can get as many people as possible.”

According to South Dakota law, petitions for a municipal referendum require at least “five percent of the registered voters in the municipality as recorded on the second Tuesday in January.”

On Jan. 14, 2025, the city clerk reported there were 151,038 registered voters in Sioux Falls and five percent would be 7,552 [Michael Doorn, “Sioux Falls Citizens Seek Vote on Data Center Rezoning,” KELO-TV, 2026.01.09].

Doorn cites last year’s voter count, but SDCL 9-20-8 bases the 5% requirement on the voter count on the second Tuesday in January “in the year the petition is filed.” Sioux Falls will base the signature requirement on last year’s voter count only if the organizers file their petition Monday, before this year’s second Tuesday. That’s unlikely—the petitioners should use every day they have until the January 29 deadline to collect signatures and raise awareness of the issue—so the signature requirement will be 5% of the voters registered in Sioux Falls as of this Tuesday, January 13, 2026. But 10,000 should be a safe goal for qualifying the zoning ordinance for a public vote.

If the petitioners do meet their signature goal, Sioux Falls will vote on the rezoning at the June 2 city election and primary. But the rezoning would stand frozen until that vote. If the California developer and his unknown Big Tech client are just itching to build, and if the city council is just itching to get their tax dollars out of this big data center, the council could vote under SDCL 9-20-11 to hold a special election as early as March 10.

7 Comments

  1. grudznick

    The Sioux Fallsians elected those fellows and that lady to represent them, and now they must live with it. Mr. Zitterich is the mastermind behind this, you could see him in the pictures just stretched out in the front row.

    Zitterich laughing. Zitterich laughing.

    Data centers are probably OK, it’s just another derangement syndrome that developed in some paranoid minds.

  2. Yes Grudz, data centers are perfect for South Dakota. They should put them all there.

  3. Murders by ICE are probably OK, it’s just another derangement syndrome that developed in some paranoid minds.

  4. East River is a dead zone: smarter people than i can figure out how to sort out that mess besides everything east of the Missouri River is Cleveland anyway.

    Let’s face it: the only worse place than Pierre or Aberdeen to live is DC.

    It’s obvious this phenomenon is no accident: it has been manufactured to make the state a corporatist tax haven for an exclusive set of Republicans while over $3 trillion languish in South Dakota banks.

  5. Porter Lansing

    Yeah… that “light industrial” is a scary thing. !??
    From Cory’s reference article: …only a psychopath would want to wear a device that is “fully aware of a user’s surroundings and life” at all times.
    – I’m not a psychopath. I’d have known so by now. I think such a device would be life saving, just for a beginning. What’s the fear corridor, here? Where does this fear of the future come from? I have a device in my home with a camera and my daughter in Florida can look at me and speak to me if she wants. Like an OG baby monitor. #grins She’s with patients all day and looking at me prolly isn’t high on her list.

  6. Donald Pay

    Glad to see Sioux Fallsians out in force petitioning on this. Like most vicitorius citizen initiative/referendum efforts in South Dakota, this one unites all ideological corners against questionable decisions by government official to benefit fat-cat special interests. It is not just Mr. Zitterich, Grudz. It is just about everyone who values their community.

    I think data centers need regulation, and the impacts of such centers need far more study before the are sited. I also think that AI needs a lot more regulation. The actual users of this data center have not been disclosed. That needs to happen, as well as what they will be using it for. Do you want criminal syndicates operating out that hub? There’s nothing wrong with taking a year or two to study the issue, draw up some regulations that protect citizens from the impacts of skyrocketing electric rates. Sioux Falls did that back in the 1990s when some medical waste incinerator companies wanted to site their operations there.

  7. Larry I’ve lived in both Pierre and Aberdeen. In Pierre I worked for the state and was allowed to check out any and all art books. They were way upstairs you had to turn on the little light by yourself. In Aberdeen which was a pretty Democratic town I met my wife. Aberdeen was much nicer than Pierre. It was fine to get out and go to Vermillion to graduate Art School. First sculptor to graduate. Then taught in Reno and after that Sarasota. Aberdeen was a nice place, friendly people it was always fun.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *