But Peters doesn’t have a clear path to vanquishing a scourge of the GOP establishment. Peters and Paulsen are on the June 20 ballot with a third candidate, former councilman Jason Redemske, who lost his seat to Paulsen in 2021 and now wants that seat back. Redemske whacks Peters as a carpetbagger:
Are there any actual real issues being addressed by the candidates in this race? Whether you are a new resident or have been stuck in a city for a lifetime means little or nothing. I suppose a long-term resident knows more about what used to be, and probably has more contacts in the city, but elections are about the future. What do you want to do?
These are supposedly non-partisan races. And there are, supposedly, no religious tests for holding office. Maybe it’s me, but I prefer to vote for candidates who have a platform of ideas, rather than a lot of political gripes and pretend religious credentials. Tell me how you’re going to make life better for all citizens, not just satisfy your own egos.
Robb
One main issue is the flooding that happens about every 5 years in Watertown. Along with all the chemicals and cow manure that washes into the lake from the farms up north. We need a candidate who is going to represent the citizens of Watertown and not the farmers. We need a dam built before there is no more lake. I believe Collin Paulsen is the best man for the job. Redemske would be my 2nd choice. Being a farm/ag lender Peters is gonna do whats best for the farmers and not the people of Watertown.
Charles A Larkin
What is Peters educational background? You never mentioned that?
Thanks
Donald Pay
Robb, Now that’s an actual issue. How are candidates addressing that issue?
Arlo Blundt
Yes, Watertown sits as a huge agricultural sump and Lake Kampeska, which could be a jewell of a focus area for the City, is green with algae.
Are there any actual real issues being addressed by the candidates in this race? Whether you are a new resident or have been stuck in a city for a lifetime means little or nothing. I suppose a long-term resident knows more about what used to be, and probably has more contacts in the city, but elections are about the future. What do you want to do?
These are supposedly non-partisan races. And there are, supposedly, no religious tests for holding office. Maybe it’s me, but I prefer to vote for candidates who have a platform of ideas, rather than a lot of political gripes and pretend religious credentials. Tell me how you’re going to make life better for all citizens, not just satisfy your own egos.
One main issue is the flooding that happens about every 5 years in Watertown. Along with all the chemicals and cow manure that washes into the lake from the farms up north. We need a candidate who is going to represent the citizens of Watertown and not the farmers. We need a dam built before there is no more lake. I believe Collin Paulsen is the best man for the job. Redemske would be my 2nd choice. Being a farm/ag lender Peters is gonna do whats best for the farmers and not the people of Watertown.
What is Peters educational background? You never mentioned that?
Thanks
Robb, Now that’s an actual issue. How are candidates addressing that issue?
Yes, Watertown sits as a huge agricultural sump and Lake Kampeska, which could be a jewell of a focus area for the City, is green with algae.