In an apparent effort to make life harder for farmers and poor eaters, the Sonny Perdue USDA has made a strange contracting decision that will lead to canceling the ability of farmers markets to accept SNAP benefits.
According to Modern Farmer, last November the USDA gave a $1.3-million contract to a new, unknown company, Financial Transaction Management, with one listed employee, Angela Sparrow, who doesn’t talk much to the press. Apparently FTM booted the previous SNAP-processing tech provider and waited until this month to take applications for new providers, meaning that FTM won’t have a new provider in place by July 31, when the prior provider contract runs out, to facilitate SNAP purchases at farmers markets.
The FTM contract smells fishy:
Going further down in the USDA statement we have this: “Throughout the program, FNS has worked with three different contractors; the National Association of Farmers’ Market Nutrition Programs (also known as MarketLink), the Farmers Market Coalition (FMC), and most recently, Financial Transaction Management (FTM). All three contracts were awarded through an open, competitive process that complied with federal contracting laws, and the companies were chosen because they were both technically acceptable and the best value.”
FTM, as we reported, is listed on GovTribe as having a single employee, who did not respond to repeated requests for comment. FTM was also formed mere weeks before the contract became available, and neither FTM nor the USDA has provided documentation regarding who FTM is, why they were awarded the contract, and what their plans are for the future of this program, none of which is particularly “open” [Dan Nosowitz, “USDA Responds to SNAP Issues at Farmers Market, But Does Not Clarify,” Modern Farmer, 2018.07.16].
USDA also appears to be falsely shifting blame for the impending loss of service to the previous provider:
Let’s start off with the problem of that first clause, “Since being notified of the provider’s decision to discontinue service.” That provider, Novo Dia, told us that, despite repeated attempts to get anyone from FTM on the phone, it took weeks to get a response, at which time Novo Dia was told that it would not be supported. The USDA’s phrasing makes it sound like Novo Dia surprised the USDA with its decision, and that this was Novo Dia’s decision at all. Both are false; according to Novo Dia’s president, Josh Wiles, Novo Dia would have been happy to continue providing its service, and would certainly have said something earlier if anyone at either FTM or the USDA had communicated with them [Nosowitz, 2018.07.16].