Skip to content

Black Hills Supporting More Local Farms Per Capita Than Sioux Falls/Brookings Region

The South Dakota Healthy Nutrition Collaborative has put its food-landscape data into fun interactive charts on FRANK   —no, not a subtle endorsement of Kloucek for Public Utilities Commission by clever and subversive liberal nutritionists, but an acronymic database: Food Resources, Access, & Nutrition Knowledge, hosted by the South Dakota Department of Health. Among the visualizations available is this map showing 260 “local farms”—i.e., farms selling food they grow directly to their neighbors:

FRANK—Food Resources, Access, & Nutrition Knowledge: "Local Farms" mapped by county, South Dakota Department of Health, retrieved 2026.09.21. [Click to access interactive original, which shows numbers by county!]
FRANK—Food Resources, Access, & Nutrition Knowledge: “Local Farms” mapped by county, South Dakota Department of Health, retrieved 2026.09.21. [Click image to access interactive original, select “Local Farms” to see numbers by county!]
80 local farms—over 30% of the neighbor-feeding operations identified statewide by SDHNC—serve the Black Hills in Pennington, Meade, Lawrence, Butte, Custer, Fall River, and Oglala Lakota counties. By FRANK’s population figures, that’s one local farm per 2,600 residents across that seven-county area. Surprisingly, in loamier, moister, and more populous East River, 51 local farms serve Minnehaha and its five adjacent counties. Brookings County adds another 14 local farms to the I-29 corridor. With 65 local farms total, that eastern seven-county region has one local farm for every 5,200 eaters. Statewide, South Dakota has one local farm for every 3,500 residents.

Either Black Hills folks are hungrier for local foods and are thus supporting twice as much local ag per capita as Sioux Falls/Brookings-area residents, or there’s room for a lot more local farms in the southeast South Dakota market.

Whatever demand these local farms are able to meet, that’s in competition with all the commodity crops and processed food that our corporate-warped farm policy favors. Imagine how many more local farms could spring up and support Rapid City, Sioux Falls, Brookings, Milbank, Sisseton, Eagle Butte, and Martin if we passed a Farm Bill that simply leveled the playing field and treated farmers growing fresh food for their neighbors as equal in importance to the big corporate monoculturalists and their factory fields.

4 Comments

  1. Porter Lansing

    It’s just so darn hard to have an outdoor fruit & vegetable stand up there.

    In fact, anything outdoors is a full hardship with SD’s incessant wind.

    Big wind makes white people anxious and that’s not conducive to buying delicate foodstuffs.

    Flies, too …..

  2. grudznick

    Indeed, Mr. Lansing. While grudznick much enjoys the markets with foods and crafts, the flies are incessant. Incessant! This is why I advocate to the city to do more spraying of the spray when they drive trucks around at night, and for them to get out into the woods and spray grudznick’s road too. Not just down town.

    grudznick worries that once the Indians take back my close personal friend Lar’s driveway they will start to ban the spraying of the bugs, which are incessant. The wind blows away napkins and bugspray yet the bugs remain.

  3. Mark Mowry

    I have my doubts that West Region consumers are so markably supportive of local farms; more likely it’s just the easy access to local produce compared with the preponderance of corporate farming along the MN/SD border.
    This is what happens when we solicit federal and state government to underwrite every conceivable aspect of ag industries. . . Congratulations?

  4. Edwin Arndt

    And what are these “local” farms supposed to sell during
    the winter? The system we have has evolved over many years.
    It was not imposed by the government, as some of you
    try to argue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *