Trump’s Dangerous Incompetence Sparks Mutiny in the White House
By Cory Allen Heidelberger on 2018-09-06
Trump supporters told us that wealthy Manhattan real estate manipulator Donald Trump would be a great leader who would inspire confidence and loyalty from the people around him in the White House. We should stop ascribing any meaning to the words of Trump supporters and recognize their statements as mere whitewashing of the base impulses the wizard of id stimulates.
Instead of loyalty, Donald Trump has inspired running mutiny, as a handful of sane, stable officials try to sabotage Trump’s “impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective” leadership. So writes an anonymous senior official in the Trump Administration in this explosive New York Times declaration of a “two-track presidency“:
From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.
Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.
“There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,” a top official complained to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.
The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful [anonymous, “I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration,” New York Times, 2018.09.05].
David Frum agrees with this assessment of Trump’s dangerous incompetence, which fits with the evidence of Trump’s own words and actions and the assessment of almost everyone not playing Fox News on their telescreens all day long. However, Frum says unnamed, unelected advisors waging mutiny against a duly elected President an unconstitutional approach to a problem better solved by other means:
Speak in your own name. Resign in a way that will count. Present the evidence that will justify an invocation of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, or an impeachment, or at the very least, the first necessary step toward either outcome, a Democratic Congress after the November elections.
Your service in government is valuable. Thank you for it. But it is not so indispensable that it can compensate for the continuing tenure of a president you believe to be amoral, untruthful, irrational, antidemocratic, unpatriotic, and dangerous. Previous generations of Americans have sacrificed fortunes, health, and lives to serve the country. You are asked only to tell the truth aloud and with your name attached [David Frum, “This Is a Constitutional Crisis,” The Atlantic, 2018.09.05].
I understand Trump officials face a hard choice with real, global consequences. I understand that people of good conscience can come to different conclusions about the merits of drastic action against a dangerous tyrant. Individuals in the White House who choose to work quietly against Trump are calculating possibilities of success amidst an abundance of unknowns: Will my resignation make a difference? Will the Republican House vote to impeach? Will the Senate convict? Will there be enough Democrats in Congress after November to make impeachment viable? Will the radicals with whom Trump would replace me do more damage to the country before impeachment could get rolling? Will Trump respond to a 25th Amendment push by invoking martial law and rolling tanks on Washington?
I want to believe that if the writer of yesterday’s NYT op-ed and fellow mutineers were to follow Frum’s advice, a mass resignation of decent public servants accompanied by a massive document dump and testimony before Congress would make a compelling case for impeachment. And when disrespect for the rule of law is the truest ground for impeachment, stepping out of the White House instead of remaining inside in unconstitutional mutiny would reinforce respect for rule of law.
That, Trump supporters, is where your id has led us: not to some fabled lost Great™ness, but to an American crisis that could realistically lead to the White House ripping up the Constitution or starting World War Three.
I write two articles last summer and early fall, both for The Nonprofit Quarterly (NPQ). One dealt with the history and mechanics of impeachment, and the other dealt with the use of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to remove a sitting President. Impeachment is difficult and rare (whether used against the President or against other federal officials), and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment has never been tested. David Frum (quoted in the blog post) and other would be well-served to learn about the processes – and their Constutitional pitfalls – before blithely recommending either or both courses. Anyone who tells you it’s simple hasn’t done their homework.
The Republican’s should actually govern and put country first. They all swore on the Book that they would defend the Constitution both from within and abroad. But they only defend their party to keep their seat at the trough. Comrade NOem proves this tomorrow with her grift with the crazy con man, trump. trump should never have been seated in the first place as the evidence is clear there was foreign intervention in the rigged election. Republicans act like no one knows that Putin’s Russia was behind the false election results.
One more thing, as we now know that trump is nuts, why not hold the grift in Yankton at a special place? Comrade NOem would still get the grift and the con man would get the help he needs, there, two birds with one stone.
Anne Beal
2018-09-07 09:04
It’s pretty hard to invoke the 25th Amendment and remain anonymous you know. It’s all very well for the NYT to publish an anonymous author, but now Elizabeth Warren wants to have the POTUS removed from office because of it. So the first thing that needs to happen is the identification of the source. As much as Trump wants to know who it is, Liz wants to know even more.
OldSarg
2018-09-07 09:38
“who are willing to pay $5,000 just to have a picture taken with their king and his abject vassal duchess in South Dakota” The $5,000 will go a long way in helping Noem finish off this election.
As far as a mutiny goes; one anonymous letter is hardy a mutiny but since you like using the word mutiny, and you may be very right in its use as mutiny is defined as “with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition”.
Maybe you would like to know the punishment for mutiny. It falls under 10 U.S. Code § 894 – Art. 94? Death
How far are you willing to push this Cory? What if they find this “anonymous” person and they are charged due to your bringing out the topic of mutiny? The likelihood of that happening is rather farfetched but don’t you have any responsibility for adding fuel to this fire? Look at many of your minions on this site verbally attacking others. Were any of your minions involved with the Laramie burning? What if there had been a cleaning person in the office? Oh, you can say “I just printed words on a blog. It’s free speech!” and you would be right but morally and ethically you are a part of the action. No, you did not yell Fire but you are certainly adding wood. . .
jerry
2018-09-07 09:52
Mutiny does not count when it is against treason. Article 3 states clearly:”
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”
Comrade trump will not even answer questions in writing regarding Russian interference regarding:
ADHERING. Cleaving to, or joining; as, adhering to the enemies of the United States. … 3, s 3, defines treason against the United States, to consist only in levying war against them or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”
So there ya go, no attacks, just facts.
mike from iowa
2018-09-07 10:01
Ms Beal, the first thing needs to be an intervention in the Kremlin Annex. Have Drumpf stuffed into a strait jacket and hauled off to an insane asylum for testing.
Then his defenders, people like you and OldSnakehead need be intervened as well because whatever Drumpf has is contagious.
You cannot deny Drumpf’s mental illnesses any longer.
Ryan
2018-09-07 11:45
I wish i had a million twitter followers so I could say – “You heard it hear first!”
Here’s what happened:
Pence or a pence lacky wrote the letter…at trump’s direction. It’s a false flag. It’s classic narcissistic trump. Anybody notice how he’s collecting the denials and combing through them to see how strongly people are wording their statements? He fears that he is losing his grip on his people and he is making them all show their “loyalty” by scaring them all into feeling like they are all on the chopping block so they beg for their jobs by kissing his giant @ss and promising they would never, ever, ever say anything to question him.
When it comes out that he was behind it, you may all refer to me as Oracle. (mike, you can keep using your pet names, though, I quite like them).
Debbo
2018-09-07 23:31
Ryan, that sounds too smart for Pootie’s Puppet, but if you are right I will call you Oracle. You will have earned it.
Bookies are taking bets on who Anonymous is and last I heard, odds favored Prissy Pussy Pency. I doubt that. He’s an enormous kisser of enormous asses. My figurative $ is on Kelly.
I write two articles last summer and early fall, both for The Nonprofit Quarterly (NPQ). One dealt with the history and mechanics of impeachment, and the other dealt with the use of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to remove a sitting President. Impeachment is difficult and rare (whether used against the President or against other federal officials), and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment has never been tested. David Frum (quoted in the blog post) and other would be well-served to learn about the processes – and their Constutitional pitfalls – before blithely recommending either or both courses. Anyone who tells you it’s simple hasn’t done their homework.
Here’s a link to the article I wrote on the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. The first line of the article includes a hyperlink to my article on impeachment: https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2017/10/19/civil-society-twenty-fifth-amendment-age-trump/
The Republican’s should actually govern and put country first. They all swore on the Book that they would defend the Constitution both from within and abroad. But they only defend their party to keep their seat at the trough. Comrade NOem proves this tomorrow with her grift with the crazy con man, trump. trump should never have been seated in the first place as the evidence is clear there was foreign intervention in the rigged election. Republicans act like no one knows that Putin’s Russia was behind the false election results.
One more thing, as we now know that trump is nuts, why not hold the grift in Yankton at a special place? Comrade NOem would still get the grift and the con man would get the help he needs, there, two birds with one stone.
It’s pretty hard to invoke the 25th Amendment and remain anonymous you know. It’s all very well for the NYT to publish an anonymous author, but now Elizabeth Warren wants to have the POTUS removed from office because of it. So the first thing that needs to happen is the identification of the source. As much as Trump wants to know who it is, Liz wants to know even more.
“who are willing to pay $5,000 just to have a picture taken with their king and his abject vassal duchess in South Dakota” The $5,000 will go a long way in helping Noem finish off this election.
As far as a mutiny goes; one anonymous letter is hardy a mutiny but since you like using the word mutiny, and you may be very right in its use as mutiny is defined as “with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition”.
Maybe you would like to know the punishment for mutiny. It falls under 10 U.S. Code § 894 – Art. 94? Death
How far are you willing to push this Cory? What if they find this “anonymous” person and they are charged due to your bringing out the topic of mutiny? The likelihood of that happening is rather farfetched but don’t you have any responsibility for adding fuel to this fire? Look at many of your minions on this site verbally attacking others. Were any of your minions involved with the Laramie burning? What if there had been a cleaning person in the office? Oh, you can say “I just printed words on a blog. It’s free speech!” and you would be right but morally and ethically you are a part of the action. No, you did not yell Fire but you are certainly adding wood. . .
Mutiny does not count when it is against treason. Article 3 states clearly:”
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”
Comrade trump will not even answer questions in writing regarding Russian interference regarding:
ADHERING. Cleaving to, or joining; as, adhering to the enemies of the United States. … 3, s 3, defines treason against the United States, to consist only in levying war against them or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”
So there ya go, no attacks, just facts.
Ms Beal, the first thing needs to be an intervention in the Kremlin Annex. Have Drumpf stuffed into a strait jacket and hauled off to an insane asylum for testing.
Then his defenders, people like you and OldSnakehead need be intervened as well because whatever Drumpf has is contagious.
You cannot deny Drumpf’s mental illnesses any longer.
I wish i had a million twitter followers so I could say – “You heard it hear first!”
Here’s what happened:
Pence or a pence lacky wrote the letter…at trump’s direction. It’s a false flag. It’s classic narcissistic trump. Anybody notice how he’s collecting the denials and combing through them to see how strongly people are wording their statements? He fears that he is losing his grip on his people and he is making them all show their “loyalty” by scaring them all into feeling like they are all on the chopping block so they beg for their jobs by kissing his giant @ss and promising they would never, ever, ever say anything to question him.
When it comes out that he was behind it, you may all refer to me as Oracle. (mike, you can keep using your pet names, though, I quite like them).
Ryan, that sounds too smart for Pootie’s Puppet, but if you are right I will call you Oracle. You will have earned it.
Bookies are taking bets on who Anonymous is and last I heard, odds favored Prissy Pussy Pency. I doubt that. He’s an enormous kisser of enormous asses. My figurative $ is on Kelly.