The Sioux Falls Development Foundation sat on $91,000 of its city subsidy last year, and Sioux Falls still came out #1 in WalletHub’s ranking of the Best Large Cities to Start a Business:
WalletHub looked at the 150 largest cities in the U.S.—by Wikipedia’s data, Sioux Falls just makes that cut at 147. We thus don’t get to compare Sioux Falls with in-state rivals. But the only other city in a neighboring state to make the top 10 is Lincoln, Nebraska:
Overall Rank | City | Total Score | Business EnvironmentRank | Access to Resources Rank | Costs Rank |
1 | Sioux Falls, SD | 52.65 | 9 | 55 | 12 |
2 | Grand Rapids, MI | 52.52 | 16 | 43 | 13 |
3 | Oklahoma City, OK | 52.22 | 7 | 81 | 18 |
4 | Lincoln, NE | 52.03 | 34 | 4 | 66 |
5 | St. Louis, MO | 51.81 | 55 | 11 | 7 |
6 | Salt Lake City, UT | 51.07 | 98 | 3 | 26 |
7 | Charlotte, NC | 50.85 | 6 | 60 | 48 |
8 | Springfield, MO | 50.77 | 90 | 38 | 1 |
9 | Tulsa, OK | 50.69 | 66 | 21 | 4 |
10 | Amarillo, TX | 49.7 | 18 | 31 | 76 |
Regionally, Omaha ranks 19th, Minneapolis 40th, Des Moines 60th, and St. Paul 105th.
WalletHub weighs these 16 metrics in its scoring for new-business suitability:
Business Environment – Total Points: 50
- Length of Average Work Week: Full Weight (~8.33 Points)
- Average Growth of Number of Small Businesses: Full Weight (~8.33 Points)
- Number of Startups per 100,000 Residents: Full Weight (~8.33 Points)
- Average Growth of Business Revenues: Full Weight (~8.33 Points)
- Five-Year Business-Survival Rate: Full* Weight (~8.33 Points)
- Industry Variety: Full Weight (~8.33 Points)
Access to Resources – Total Points: 25
- Financing Accessibility: Full Weight (~4.17 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by dividing the “total annual value of small-business loans” by the “total number of small businesses.”- Venture Investment (amount) per Capita: Full Weight (~4.17 Points)
- Prevalence of Investors: Full Weight (~4.17 Points)
- Human-Capital Availability: Full Weight (~4.17 Points)
Note: This metric was calculated by subtracting the “unemployment rate” by the “number of job openings per number of population in labor force.”- Higher Education Assets (Average University Score & Number of Students Enrolled per Capita): Full Weight (~4.17 Points)
- College-Educated Workforce: Full Weight (~4.17 Points)
Note: This metric measures the percentage of the population holding at least a bachelor’s degree.Costs – Total Points: 25
- Office-Space Affordability: Full Weight (~6.25 Points)
Note: This metric measures the per-square-foot cost of commercial office space.- Labor Costs: Full Weight (~6.25 Points)
Note: This metric measures the median annual income of the city.- Corporate Taxes: Full* Weight (~6.25 Points)
- Cost of Living: Full Weight (~6.25 Points) [John S. Kiernan, “2016’s Best Large Cities to Start a Business,” WalletHub, downloaded 2016.05.05]
Note that labor costs are part of the calculation. Cheaper labor means a better ranking… meaning a low-wage city like Sioux Falls where nearly half the kids qualify for free or reduced-price school lunches is a great place for the entrepreneurial class to launch its dreams.
So why is Springfield MO. 60% down the list and Sioux Falls is in the top 6% when Springfield beats us by a significant amount in both categories. Something is wrong either in the calculating or the results are including more than those two categories.
I see it differently. When workers have more money they spend it and that’s good for the economy.
I agree with you, Mark! This ranking obviously values keeping people in poverty rather than true prosperity!