• Tag Archives Chamberlain
  • HB 1185 Helps Chamberlain Campground Improve; Amendment Makes 50-Year Leases of City Parks Easier to Get

    House Bill 1185 was originally designed to deal with one unique problem in one place. As prime sponsor Representative Lee Qualm explained to House Local Government yesterday (hear audio timestamp 31:35) Prior to 2000, the Army Corps of Engineers controlled the land on both sides of the Missouri River. Then Senator Tom Daschle passed legislation to transfer that land to the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks Department. GF&P has leased some of that land to the city of Chamberlain, which in turn has leased that land to the American Creek Campground. Apparently existing statute does not allow the manager of American Creek Campground to make any improvements to his facility to compete with competing campgrounds around Chamberlain. Apparently HB 1185 will allow American Creek Campground to improve and expand.

    Nobody except for Rep. Tona Rozum has voted against HB 1185 in its travels through House Local Government, the full House, and yesterday in Senate Local Government.

    But yesterday, an amendment cropped up in committee. Jumping ahead a few pages in the law books, Senator Bob Ewing moved to add a new section—completely unrelated to the Chamberlain situation, said Rep. Qualm—changing the statute on municipal park board powers over parks and boulevards. Right now, park boards can give leases to concessionaires of up to fifteen years if the concessionaire makes a realty improvement investment of at least fifty thousand dollars and up to fifty years if the concession makes realty improvements of at least one hundred thousand dollars.

    Those investment thresholds haven’t been changed for over twenty years, so you’d think an amendment would say to concessionaires, “Hey, prices have gone up. If you want to earn a fifty-year (!!!) lease, you have to sink more money into the park than we required in the 1990s.” Looking at CPI, I’d suggest that a $100K requirement from, say, 1993 equals at least $168K in today’s dollars.

    But HB 1185 now goes the opposite direction. It strikes the fifteen-year cap and makes $50K the investment threshold for a fifty-year lease.

    Now I haven’t priced bumper cars or mini-golf or other attractions like we see at Thunder Road, Senator Al Novstrup’s concession in Aberdeen’s Wylie Park. But fifty years seems like an awfully long time to give a private company exclusive rights to profit off operations on public land. At the very least, we should be making it harder, not easier, for private parties to obtain such extravagant monopoly over public property. The original intent of HB 1185, to let American Creek Campground improve its facility on the north side of Chamberlain, seems reasonable, but yesterday’s amendment extending the tie for exclusive leases on public property seems unnecessary.

    Senate Local Government asked no questions and offered no discussion of the unexpected amendment. The full Senate should ask some questions, and absent answers, should strike that amendment and pass HB 1185 in the form the House approved.



  • Guest Column: A Block off Main Street

    American Indian activist James Cadwell submits this essay on the decline of white Chamberlain and that border town’s opportunity to recover by embracing its only growing demographic, the Lakota people:

    The term reservation border town has always brought up the worst remembrances for me. As a child and later as an adult I always lived in close proximity to one such town, Chamberlain, South Dakota.

    As I was growing up, I witnessed many less than desirable incidences that have left scars both physically and emotionally. As I visited another reservation border town last week I couldn’t help but notice the number of houses boarded up or in need of repair just a block off main street. In addition, I saw a large number on businesses on Main Street that are just a memory today of this once thriving community. I could not imagine that this was the reality/fate that the generation before had planned. This community refused to acknowledge the changing demographic of its community, loss of youth and the tremendous growth of the Native American population. What once appeared to them as detriment was now their attribute for the future economic growth of that community.

    For many years the reservations of Lower Brule and Crow Creek have been treated as a burden by the city of Chamberlain. It is now apparent that just the opposite is in place. Many Native youth are moving to Chamberlain in an effort to create some independence for themselves and their new families. Chamberlain is losing its non-native youth at an alarming rate. Many have left for work, school or because of the often racist mentality (millennials for the most part refuse to participate in this type of behavior) of some of the city’s members. The median age of Chamberlain is now somewhere around 47 years of age with a newest percentage of that population being native youth that have moved into Chamberlain for jobs.  The median age of Fort Thompson and Lower Brule, home to Crow Creek and Lower Brule reservations, is just slightly over 21 years of age.

    Sadly, Chamberlain has been in a state of denial that they are in fact dependent of both of these reservations for:

    1. Economic development—Current expansion of businesses is totally dependent on the youth, this is only growing on the reservations.  Housing development is based on native youth and young native families moving to Chamberlain.  Many could argue that the Native youth are not buying the new houses as a result your statistics are wrong. I would agree, however the houses that are left when a family builds a new house or upgrades are now being utilized by this new urban native population.

    2. Entry level employees—While Natives make up less than 10% of the population in Chamberlain, they now fill nearly 1/3 of all the entry level jobs.

    3. School expansion—nearly 1/3 of the school budget comes from Federal Impact Aid dollars and taxes now being paid by Native Americans living there.

    The Governor’s 2010 initiative, a study done several years ago, was meant to help Chamberlain identify what needs to be in place to further the economic development and stabilize the current down dwindling economy. Requested by the powers that be in Chamberlain in 2007, the report clearly identified Crow Creek and Lower Brule as major contributors to the future existence of Chamberlain. The report has all but disappeared from the record and memories of the people who denied that there should be any type of effort to work with the reservations for the future of the city of Chamberlain. As a participant in the discussion about future economic development, I noticed the now mayor, bank executive, city council members, county commissioners, business owners, school board members and the general public all hearing the same recommendations from the report. As the quote from the report says: “You need to include both Crow Creek and Lower Brule in your plan” (Governor’s 2010 Initiative, South Dakota Rural Development Council). I would challenge you to ask those people involved from Chamberlain, so what happened to the recommendations?

    Are Chamberlain’s leaders contributing to the mass exodus of your youth population by their own inactivity or are they contributing to the fundamental ideas shared in the report that would helping a positive way to perpetuate the future economic growth of Chamberlain?

    Educationally things are changing in South Dakota. Within the next three years every school will be required to include the Oceti Sakowin (standards that relate to Native American history, culture, and language) into their curriculum. This is a direct result of Governor Daugaard’s sharing his concern with the deficiencies in academic success for educating Native children in the state’s public schools. Three pilot schools will be given the first chance at incorporating this changes with a grant during Fiscal Year 2017. A small group of parents of Native children in Chamberlain schools tried unsuccessfully for the past seven years to implement this soon to be mandatory change. Now without the assistance of any school administration or school board input, it will become a reality for all schools by the year 2020. I can only imagine how much further the school, educational staff, and students could be if this would have happened years ago. It is a proven fact that these changes in curriculum will decrease the low test scores that plague these students and the high dropout rate among Native youth in Chamberlain and across the rest of South Dakota. In addition, it will create a better understanding for Non-native students, administration and school board about the positive contributions of Native people in South Dakota.  Lastly, it will finally create a positive view for Native students about those positive contributions their own people made in this state we call home.

    As I mentioned earlier the term reservation border town has a negative connotation in most instances. I took the liberty to give both positive and negative examples that can result from this title.

    So what are some of the advantages to being a reservation border town?

    1. You have one of the youngest work forces in the state at your disposal.

    2. The work force will be around for the next twenty or so years.

    3. The need for additional housing will create a constant need for new homes, resulting in economic development.

    4. Your school system can continually expand with the native median age contributing as the newest students for years to come. The result is less tax burden on a limited population and still attainment of a quality education.

    5. Your largest employers are dependent on Native people for their success. The Saint Joseph Indian school has a 50-plus-million-dollar annual budget. At Chamberlain’s Sanford Health 80 to 90 percent of the births at the hospital are Native. Indian patients contribute hundreds of thousands of dollars to the hospital through Indian Health Service dollars. Native enrollment in the public school system has grown by nearly 40 percent in the last eight years; those students contribute through Impact Aid funding between $800,000 and $1,000,000 annually to the schools budget.

    6. Increased cultural awareness in the community is a great way to start breaking down barriers that have been in place for years between the communities.

    7.  Many tourists to Chamberlain area ask about the nine tribes that make their home in South Dakota. Tourism provides South Dakota many financial rewards.

    8.  Being a good neighbor and making the first move to build the bridge goes much further than maintaining the current wall of resistance to mutual cultural respect.

    9. Chamberlain is in the right place at the right time to enter cooperative change that will benefit all three communities.

    10. Chamberlainis close to a community college at Lower Brule that continues to provide post-educational options for citizens from Chamberlain area. Many of the youth require post-secondary education as one of the reasons to stay at home. Imagine what cooperative opportunities could be developed between these two entities.

    We must still contend with the disadvantages of remaining a reservation border town:

    1. The town’s economic development remains stagnant with the exception of Native contribution.

    2. The town follows suit as many small towns do in South Dakota one by one businesses close as youth continue to leave, leading to a ghost town effect.

    3. Failure to begin a dialogue with the reservations and their needs and ideas for success will result in a limited future for any type of development for Chamberlain.

    4. Failure to recognize the positive contributions that the reservation make to the community will further add to the community’s own bias about what economic reality really is.

    5. Failure to acknowledge the contributions that a joint venture between Chamberlain and the Crow Creek and Lower Brule tribes will only result in potential customers taking their business to larger more diverse communities, just as the non-native youth has done.

    6. The image portrayed across South Dakota is negative when it comes to openness with regards to acceptance of cultural diversity.

    7. As the newest generation (millennials) start to assume their role as future leaders, they will not tolerate bias toward different culture and races often displayed by border towns.

    So what does this all mean for the future of Chamberlain? It would appear to me that the city’s options are very limited due to the mass exodus of its youth. Failure to identify with these above-mentioned statistical changes in your town Chamberlain will result in a slow death “TO A BLOCK OFF MAIN STREET” and eventually Main Street itself.

    James Cadwell

    Demographic note: Chamberlain’s population peaked in the 1970 Census at 2,626. Sitting right on I-90 and the Missouri River, with easy access to transportation and recreation, its population has hung around 2,400 for the last two and a half decades. As a gateway to walleyes and the West, Chamberlain ought to be growing. Cadwell sees the student and worker base just north of Chamberlain that should boost that growth.



  • Chamberlain Students Decorate Graduation Caps; Superintendent Withholds Transcripts

    Chamberlain just can’t get its high school seniors out the door without making someone mad. Managing to avoid any blow-up this year over its resistance to respecting Lakota culture in its graduation ceremony, the Chamberlain school board this year decided to torque off a few dozen seniors by banning innocuous decorations from graduation caps.

    As far as I can tell, the nearly 50 students who asked the school board for permission to decorate their hats weren’t looking to make any statements on race relations or social justice; they just wanted to add some spangles and cute messages. But the school board said no, because (a) policy says so, and (b) graduation is about on last hurrah for conformity:

    “Graduation is the last time you will all be together and unified and you don’t want to take away from that,” said School Board Member Annette Priebe at the May 11 meeting [Hannah Baker, “District Will Tighten Grip on Attire After Students Decorate Caps,” Chamberlain Oacoma Sun, 2015.05.27, p. 1].

    Some students found that argument uncompelling and gussied up their caps anyway. Chamberlain superintendent Debra Johnson is now withholding the transcripts of those cap-itally offending students until they come meet with her one on one.

    Chamberlain says it has policy to back it up. Policy IKF/IKFA reads, “Students who are unable to meet the graduation requirements will not be permitted to participate in graduation exercises. All graduates are required to wear CHS approved caps and gowns at the graduation exercise/ceremony.”

    Policy IKF/IKFA makes CHS approval of caps and gowns a graduation requirement. However, the punishment specified by the policy for failing to meet any graduation requirement is blocking the student’s participation in the graduation ceremony. Policy IKF/IKFA does not authorize the superintendent to withhold a student’s transcript. Spangle-topped students, if the administration failed to turn you away from the graduation ceremony itself, they gave up the only punishment their cited policy authorizes.

    I must admit, I feel a little teapottishly tempestful here. I have marched in one graduation ceremony. I decorated my maroon cap with a big heart and the word “MOM”… which folks viewing from the stands thought read “WOW”. No one fussed, and life went on. But the Chamberlain school administration seems so determined to keep an iron grip on its graduation ceremony that it keeps making unnecessary trouble for itself.