Skip to content

Only Greater Losses, More Socialism Ahead for Trump-Battered Farms

You’re not going to make any money farming, not this year or next, says the Farm Bureau:

Several years of high inflation and low commodity prices, coupled with volatile production costs, are continuing to squeeze farmers financially. These forces are projected to hit farmers with $32 billion in losses for the major row crops in 2027 after a projected loss of $31 billion in 2026. Fruit, vegetable, nut and other specialty crop farmers faced billions of dollars in losses in 2025, with difficult market conditions continuing throughout 2026. American Farm Bureau Federation economists analyzed the losses felt across the farm economy in the latest Farm Bureau Intel.

The Farm Bureau Intel states, “Corn losses are projected to increase from $131 per acre in 2026 to $167 per acre in 2027. Soybean losses are projected to increase from $80 per acre to $138 per acre, wheat losses from $114 per acre to $145 per acre and cotton losses from $342 per acre to $406 per acre. Rice, sorghum, oats, barley and peanuts are also projected to remain below breakeven.”

Specialty crop producers are facing many of the same cost and market pressures. The Farm Bureau Intel outlines six representative specialty crops – almonds, apples, blueberries, lettuce, potatoes and strawberries – with “over $7 billion in estimated 2025 economic losses as labor, input, compliance and capital costs outpaced farm-level returns. Available 2026 market data show that conditions for specialty crop producers have not broadly improved.” These crops account for only about one-quarter of specialty crop receipts [American Farm Bureau Federation, press release, 2026.07.16].

Market expert John Tsitrian says farmers can thank Donald Trump for torpedoing their markets:

First, his still-inexcplicable fixation on tariffs, both during his first and current terms, has basically reset international trade fundamentals for corn and soybean producers. South America’s corn and soybean production and export market shares have grown significantly as a direct result of trade tensions and retaliatory tariffs between the U.S. and China. China heavily shifted its agricultural purchasing to South American nations like Brazil and Argentina to bypass tariffs on American crops.

Second, input costs have risen significantly because of Trump’s international policies, with energy, fertilizer and machinery costs rising because of tariff and shooting wars.

Farmers are getting stuck with high costs and low prices thanks to Trump [John Tsitrian, “Farm Bureau: Farmers Will Lose $32 Billion in ’27. Will It Help Dems in Nov.?South Dakota Standard, 2026.07.26].

And the only plan anyone has for saving those unprofitable farms is more socialism:

The Trump administration is asking Congress to send another $11 billion to farmers through taxpayer-funded farm subsidies, even though many would-be recipients are wealthy farms that already receive billions through several farm subsidy programs.

If Congress approves the request, it would be on top of the $12 billion currently allotted to farmers through the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program this year.

Farmers also already receive payments from two other categories: commodity programs and the federal Crop Insurance Program, new EWG research finds. According to data in EWG’s recently updated Farm Subsidy Database, farmers last year received a staggering $29.5 billion by “triple dipping” into three categories of farm subsidies.

The administration’s request, combined with these other payouts, would make payments swell to over $50 billion in 2026. This will place an even greater burden on taxpayers whose median income and wealth remain well below those of the average farm household. Total payments would make up a third of farm income this year [Anne Schechinger, “‘Triple Dipping’ Taxpayer Dollars: Trump Eyes Billions More in Subsidies for Wealthy Farms,” Environmental Working Group, 2026.07.16].

Hey, are any of you Republicans going to get back to advocating plain old capitalist reforms for farming?

5 Comments

  1. Jezz, pretty soon farmers will start a Non-Partisan League. They just need to be told to stay out of politics and go home and slop the hogs.

  2. Creighton University’s Ernie Goss follows the economies of ten midwestern states including South Dakota’s where the manufacturing sector lost about 800 jobs over the last year or 1.8% of its manufacturing base, ag workers still face severe stressors and a mental health provider shortage affects 62 of South Dakota’s 66 counties.

    This month’s Index dropped below growth neutral for the fifth time in the past six months, bankster confidence plummeted to 42.1 or well below 50.0 growth neutral and the economic confidence index slumped to 34.2 from June’s 42.1. Goss says low commodity prices, high diesel and fertilizer costs and a worldwide economic slowdown are also driving numbers down and because of the continuing trade-tariff volatility farm equipment sales continue to lag to a very weak 27.8 down from June’s 28.9.

    The July RMI for South Dakota declined to 43.4 from 54.7 in June. The state’s farm and ranchland price index decreased to 55.0 from June’s 57.7. South Dakota’s July new hiring index climbed to 52.5 from 49.5 in June. According to the USDA, South Dakota’s top four exported agriculture products (ethanol, pork, dairy, distillers grain) expanded by 12.4% for the first two fiscal quarters of 2026, compared to the same period in 2025.

    Rural Mainstreet Index Plummets for July

  3. Porter Lansing

    “Yeah, you stupid farmers!! Pull your slacker asses up by your bootstraps like you tell the libs!!
    Here’s help with the bills, God damn it!!” – DJT *King of America

  4. cw

    This is obviously before the govt printing presses fire up to send all the welfare queens their uh “fair share”.

  5. mike from iowa

    This is where socialism rushes in to save capitalism’s ass.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *