Foreign policy giant Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski died yesterday.
When I got my first full-time debate coaching gig, the policy debate topic was Russia. I instructed my policy debaters to read Brzezinski’s The Grand Chessboard for background.
Donald Trump likely can’t even say Brzezinski, let alone comprehend what Brzezinski said about the need for a genuinely strong America to preserve global stability:
[In 2012, Brzezinski] once again assessed the United States’ global standing in “Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power.” Here he argued that continued American strength abroad was vital to global stability, but that it would depend on the country’s ability to foster “social consensus and democratic stability” at home.
Essential to those goals, he wrote, would be a narrowing of the yawning income gap between the wealthiest and the rest, a restructuring of the financial system so that it no longer mainly benefited “greedy Wall Street speculators” and a meaningful response to climate change.
A United States in decline, he said — one “unwilling or unable to protect states it once considered, for national interest and/or doctrinal reasons, worthy of its engagement” — could lead to a “protracted phase of rather inconclusive and somewhat chaotic realignments of both global and regional power, with no grand winners and many more losers” [Daniel Lewis, “Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter, Dies at 89,” New York Times, 2017.05.26].
Brzezinski decried Trump’s lack of coherent foreign policy on March 17, a diagnosis uncontradicted by the last ten weeks of Trump’s continuing humiliation of America:
MARTIN: Can you attribute any of this to the fact that this is a new administration full of outsiders who aren’t political careerists, who are just trying to get their footing? Can you see eventually a more cohesive foreign policy and bureaucratic structure coming into place later?
BRZEZINSKI: From the top down, if there is a from-the-top-down leadership, yes. But I don’t see that from the top-down leadership. I have been involved in or an observer of several administration changes and including some very basic disagreements about foreign policy. But these were serious disagreements with clear purposes in mind, even if these purposes were different or clashing.
I don’t see any of that. I think the United States is currently a kind of wonder – wonderland with the president speaking on subjects of his choice, some of which are entertaining, but none of which are very strategically substantive [Rachel Martin, “Zbigniew Brzezinski on Trump’s Foreign Policy,” NPR: Morning Edition, 2017.03.17].
The Russians and other world leaders are laughing at Trump’s America. Brzezinski would not put up with such self-inflicted embarrassment, and neither should we. Trump, shape up or ship out. Our dominant position on the Grand Chessboard depends on it.
Drumpf is smarter than Brzezinski. Just ask him. Drumpf is smarter than his generals and his tax lawyers. Just ask him.
This guy has/had a clear view of the world. And then there was Kissinger and C Rice to muddy the waters.
They pay for full time debating teachers? That is insaner that all get out. Those teachers should be made to teach real classes or the debating should be cut and those funds redistributed to the districts best teachers in math and science and other real topics.
I always thought that Brezezinski was one of President Carter’s better picks.
Smarter than anyone working for Trump, apparently.
For so long now, having a conversation with a Republican about healthcare or global warming has been like trying to converse with an Asperger’s-Tourette’s syndrome patient who interrupts constantly and blurts out things that are totally irrelevant.
I say global warming – they say, “but but but, what about Al Gore flying on private jets?” I say health care, they say, “but but but Obama’s a secret Muslim born in Africa and what about George Soros?”
Seriously, the majority of Republicans nationwide, do not know how to talk or think about America. Trump reflects who our Republican voters really are.
I saw a talking head on TV, whome I agree with on the issue, saying that if the Democratic Party wants to make any nationwide progress in 2018 and 2020, they have to take all their eggs out of rural demographics and put them into targeting suburban voters. As long as national resources are limited, I’m pretty sure that’s what we’re going to see in the next two election cycles.