Skip to content

John Kennedy Claussen Seeks Chair, Promises Focus on Democratic Values and Math

John Kennedy Claussen, Sr.
John Kennedy Claussen, Sr.

John Kennedy Claussen, Sr., formally announced his candidacy for South Dakota Democratic Party chair this week. The Sioux Falls Democrat  distinguished himself at the Democratic convention last summer (the first one, the convention whose nominations the chair he wants to replace annulled by bungling the paperwork, requiring that we convene a second time, at the last minute, to renominate statewide candidates) by nominating Democrat Kooper Caraway to challenge Billie Sutton’s preferred running mate, long-time Republican Michelle Lavallee. Claussen also distinguishes himself as the only chair candidate among the top 25 commenters on Dakota Free Press in 2018.

Claussen submits this call to support his bid to lead South Dakota Democrats to something better than impotent malaise:

Dear Fellow South Dakota Democrats:

This past Friday, I turned 58 years old. But it is was not only a birthday, it was also my 40th anniversary as a registered South Dakota Democrat. Fore, I vividly remember registering at the Minnehaha County Courthouse back on my eighteenth birthday in 1979, after a day of classes at the old Washington High School. Since that time much has happened to and with the South Dakota Democratic Party. In fact, we have all been through a lot as a political party. There have been victories and there have been many defeats, but in recent years we have drifted into a malaise, which cannot be corrected by staying the course, rather only remedied by taking on a new course and seeking new leadership, and in so doing, that is why I declare my candidacy today for the chairmanship of the South Dakota Democratic Party.

I seek this challenge, because I have been a fighter all my life for the values which the Democratic Party is and is supposed to be about. In my lifetime, I have been a student, even a student leader as a former Student Body President at a USD, a store clerk, a janitor, a member of a union, even at times a self-proclaimed and recognized ”union steward” in non-union employment situations, a political activist, a banker, and an insurance agent. I have worn many hats, which prepared me for this position, and these experiences have further taught, or reassured me, that we as Democrats are right on the issues, but those issues cannot be heard nor implemented here in South Dakota if we continue the same course.…

And as I think of the course we must take, I reflect upon the memories of my Democratic life, which stretch over fifty plus years, with some symbolic while others are of substance, which cause me to run today to help my political party to reach the stars of a greater hope. Fore, I remember attending a Democratic women’s coffee that my mother hosted at our house in ’64, when I was 3, where one of the local Democratic women leaders gave me a LBJ/HHH button, which flashed, that I still have to this day. I shook RFK’s hand in ’68. I attended Democratic Forum for the first time in 1971 at age 10. I stuffed envelopes for McGovern in ’72. At age 12, I attended the Ward Clark dinner—a SDDP fundraiser—with fellow family members and with Senators McGovern, Abourezk, and Adlai Stevenson III in attendance. In the mid 1970s, I remember attending a premiere showing of Give’em Hell, Harry! at the Western Mall theater in Sioux Falls, which was a Democratic fundraiser, with then Governor Kneip setting right behind me as we all laughed as Truman’s character in the film enlightened us all. And before much of this, I especially remember as a child working at the fair in Minnehaha County with my older sister, as passersbys would ask us at the Democratic booth if it was pronounced, “Nip or Nipe?” thinking the “K” was silent. Then later in life as a young adult, I volunteered and interned for then Rep. Tom Daschle in DC, was Student Body President and Young Democrats President at USD, and a delegate at a national political convention before my 20th birthday, where I heard in person one of the greatest political speeches of the 20th Century, when I and others were reminded that, “The hope still lives and the dream shall never die.”

Throughout my Democratic life, I have served many positions within the Democratic Party, too. Not only YD President at USD, but I have also been past treasurer and vice-chair of South Dakota Young Democrats, chairman of the Legislative District 12 Democrats, treasurer, vice-chair, and chair of the Minnehaha County Democratic Party, and a Democratic nominee for the State Senate in District 12, a delegate to five state Democratic conventions, and of course was a voting delegate as a part of the South Dakota Delegation to the 1980 Democratic National Convention….. In fact, I served at that national convention some 40 years ago with Billie’s grandfather. He was a Carter delegate, while I was a Kennedy delegate.

My personal electoral experiences have been very intriguing, too. Before receiving my BA in political science with minors in history, French, and economics from USD, along with a summer at Georgetown University studying comparative political and economic systems, and having been a Truman Scholarship nominee from South Dakota, I was elected Student Body President at USD, while also being President of Young Democrats on a northern plains campus in the age of Reagan; a time when College Republican could get hundred plus students to show up for a meeting to defeat McGovern, while Young Democrats were in the teens in attendance. And I accomplished those feats because I understood the math involved and my strategy overcame any issue of popularity; an understanding which then played a great part in allowing me as a 19 year old to be found standing on the floor of Madison Square Garden at the 1980 Democratic National Convention as well.

When running for the state senate, I lost in ’92 by a 49 to 51 margin to a very popular Republican incumbent in a very Republican legislative district. And for what it is worth, I carried six of the eleven precincts in my district that year; and I often joked prior to the advent of Bush43 and Trump, that I actually won the electoral college in District 12 back in ’92, too. The last time I ran for the state senate in ’96, I was the only Democratic state senate candidate outside of the heavily dominant Democratic District of 15, in the city of Sioux Falls, to carry more than one precinct, when I stood for election that year.

And the real reason I have had these proud feats is because I understand that it is more than message…. It is also the math…..In fact, before taking early semi-retirement, I worked for a major retailer for almost 30 years, were I was a district ‘All Star Salesperson’ for over 20 years and ranked nationally three times with a 2nd and two 1st place national placings in sales with my employer. And like my electoral feats, I understood it was the math and not just the art of the sale, which made we successful with my employer.

And I believe, it is now that understanding which needs to be applied to our South Dakota Democratic Party…. And I also ask you to realize that throughout these electoral and employment feats and endeavors, I can proudly claim that I have been married for 31 years, and my wife, Beth, and I have two great children with Master’s degrees, straight teeth ;-), and now good paying jobs.

But that is my story; what is the story of the SDDP today? Well, it is a story of a political party that appears to be dependent upon a “Rock Star” strategy, where we throw anything at the wall hoping that something sticks. In this post-McGovern era, our party has become over time too sanitized, too stale, and too cautious as well, with strategies that worked for a time, but whose shelf life has now been spent. Fore, it is time we recognized as Democrats that it is not really 2019, rather it is 1953, and we must begin again to rebuild the party. We have gone full circle as a political party and it is time we seized an opportunity to be proactive in our decision making and accept a frankness of where we really are right now as a political party….Else we will continue to dwell in a world of continual malaise.

2018 was a lost opportunity, where we allowed image and an attempted message to ignore the need to understand the math involved in order to truly win elections. Our culture as a political party needs to change. We must recognize that if we do not understand the math involved in a political race, then we do not understand what we are really up against. Currently, we spend a third of our party budget on staff, but to what avail? Had it not been for the racist comment by a Republican Minnehaha County legislator and the efforts of the women’s organization LEAD in Minnehaha County, we would have actually lost seats in the state legislature this past election cycle—a cycle we were told was a part of a “Blue Wave.”

So it is time to ask: are we better off than we were four years ago as a political party? I believe the answer is “No.” It’s “No,” because our party no longer knows or cares to know how to win elections. Because elections cannot be won without an effect canvass/GOTV effort, which was definitely lacking in 2018. Nor can a Democratic Party win, if it tries to play the religion card, or does not trust a woman’s choice, or is willing to be an enabler to a culture that contributes to the deaths of many of our children while in schools throughout the land each year; with all of these latter comments illustrating an ill-fated attempt to be what we are really not as a political party….and thus no wonder that we lost so greatly in 2018.

With 2018 as a missed opportunity, it is time to take advantage of 2020 and beyond, but to do that, we need a strategic plan that takes us through 2030 and here are my ideas:

  • Establish a more adequate messaging of what exactly our legislators are trying to accomplish in Pierre as a minority political party.
  • Recognize the importance of a full slate and that no Republican personality is too great to be challenged; e.g. Thune/2010.
  • Continue work to develop the vote on the reservations, but also attach that strategy to particular legislative districts—like District 15—which are underperforming for us as a political party.
  • Develop a boot camp in addition to YELL on how to run elections with an emphasis on the art of canvassing/GOVT to create the next generation of young men and women party leaders in the tradition of Hildebrand, Jarding, Erpenbach, Hauffe, and Samuelson – and the boot camp should be named after the great South Dakota political strategist, Pete Stavrianos.
  • Target races in a proactive manner and not rely merely upon a matching funds program.
  • Re-establish a political culture in our party that recognizes that is takes more than message to win, noting that we also need to understand the math involved in order to win elections.
  • Develop a 2030 plan to return the Democratic Party to relevance over the next few years in preparation of the 75th anniversary of McGovern having taken over and organizing our political party—a plan that encompasses ending the Republican supermajority in Pierre, regaining a majority on the PUC, and having at least one member of the South Dakota delegation in Washington as a Democrat.
  • Develop a 2022 Plan, too, to deal with the pending reality of further Republican gerrymandering in this state and other factors which could uniquely make 2022 a challenging year for Democrats in South Dakota.
  • Hold state conventions where picking constitutional candidates is the last thing we do and not the first thing we do, so that democracy can breathe.
  • Deputize a 100 Democrats throughout the state with a goal of registering 50,000 new Democrats in South Dakota by 2024. (That’s less than 9 per deputy per month.)
  • Seek-out greater contributions from former affluent South Dakota Democrats who now reside outside of South Dakota—especially in D.C.
  • Develop a true canvassing and GOTV program to assist statewide candidates, with local candidates then benefitting from this as well.
  • Keep offices in Rapid City and Sioux Falls with long term plans to add a permanent office in Aberdeen and satellite offices in Brookings, Vermillion, and Pierre during election years, and when the legislature is in session.
  • I also agree with some of the ideas of the other candidates for State Chair as well, when they call for expanding relations and coordination with county parties, continuing to develop our use of social medias, and continuing the growth of Founders Club and other potential fundraising programs.

As far as a running-mate for this chairmanship race, I will also add, that while others have chosen a running mate in hopes of winning, I am running so the Party will win again and my vice-Chair will be your pick—the State Central Committee’s—and not mine, because we must all work together to get the job done. Fore, it is time we became once again a political party and not just continue as a social club. And I am also not running as a part of a ticket, because I have a greater confidence in my beliefs than any need to be dependent upon an other’s personality, or status, to carry me.

In conclusion, the struggle regardless of the outcome on March 23rd does not end there, it only begins a new chapter for us all, because whoever is the new chairperson will need the support of us all. So let us make this a positive campaign from the start, knowing that whether you support my candidacy or not, we need a change; and I believe I am that change who also brings a strong understanding of the institutional history of our state political party and where we have been, and what we need to do to be more….

But if you like the status quo, then don’t consider my candidacy or vote for me…. And as a fan of the late musician, Prince Rogers Nelson, I think it’s time that we turned something red into purple. Will you join me in doing so?….

Thank you very much for your consideration and hopefully for your support,

Respectfully,

John Kennedy Claussen, Sr.,
Vice-Chair of the Minnehaha County Democratic Party
and Chairman of Legislative District 12 Democrats

The State Central Committee of the Democratic Party meets five weeks from today in Oacoma to choose the next party chair from among Claussen, Allison Renville, Tom Cool, John Cunningham, Paula Hawks, and incumbent chair Ann Tornberg.

13 Comments

  1. Porter Lansing

    I used to enjoy shopping at JC Penney’s. I suppose the numbers just don’t add up for them, anymore. Great resume’. Great enthusiasm and a “to the point” address of the problem. People won’t get off their asses and go out and knock doors. High school leaders are what’s needed. High school leaders attract campaign workers like no other leaders. In a group of three, they won’t get ridiculed by the Republicans when the door is answered.
    Good luck, JKC

  2. Frank Kloucek

    John Claussen would be a great leader for the SDDP!

  3. He’s probably the #1 commenter on my site. Porter, I bought a lot of Converse All-Stars from Claussen, that’s for sure.

  4. Adam

    South Dakota Democrats do not know how, nor do they have the heart necessary, to properly compete against Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Breitbart, Fox News, nor the other two thirds of SD’s population which is helping enable Russia to terrorize the world. So, we get what we get.

    Look, if SD Dems want to make the country or world a better place, we’ve got to speak to people in populated (other) states, about how we know FIRST HAND how morally and cognitively incorrigible the invincible majority is in the Upper Mid-West, and how CRITICALLY important it is for THEM to out-weigh our 5 state region’s radical mush for brains culture.

    For over 50 years, every SD Dem vote for President has simply not counted – at all, but there are places where when Moderate Republicans, Dems and Indys vote for President it really does matter – and those people ALL need to much better realize what they are truly up AGAINST. Often, unfortunately, in life, we don’t get to choose our enemies, but when a majority of what appears to be mentally ill people choose to make you the demographic which they hate the very most, in society, you need to realize that you’re dealing with a decent sized bunch of feral animals.

    That’s the real national emergency. Our state Dem Party should believe it has work to do outside of our state as well as within it.

  5. Debbo

    “Nor can a Democratic Party win, if it tries to play the religion card, or does not trust a woman’s choice, or is willing to be an enabler to a culture that contributes to the deaths of many of our children while in schools throughout the land each year; with all of these latter comments illustrating an ill-fated attempt to be what we are really not as a political party….and thus no wonder that we lost so greatly in 2018.”

    Exactly right. Democrats need to be Democrats!

    Adam, I think the most most shocking and dismaying thing I’ve learned in 2017 and on is that there are far more Americans who are hugely ignorant, racist and sociopathic than I would have Ever guessed!

    That’s been the goal of the really horrible, wealthy psychopaths like the Kochs, Mercers, Greens and less wealthy politicians like Dick Armey, the Newt and others. The people in this paragraph are the real monsters, the real feral creatures.

  6. Wait a minute, Adam: work outside our state? Are you saying that the local Republican culture is so “incorrigible and invincible” that we might as well not run any Democrats for office in South Dakota and instead send all of our money and talent to work on races in winnable states? Are you saying it’s time for this blog to stop wasting time discussing the unchangeable policies of Governor Noem and the South Dakota Legislature and change focus to national politics?

  7. Adam

    Yes, sometimes a State Party Chair should go out and give speeches to Dems in other states, and often times, they receive reciprocal compensation. I only suggest that these messaging efforts be centered around ‘knowing thy enemy’ as SD has a much higher concentration and magnitude of radicalism than most states and SD Dems have some of the very most substantial firsthand experience with it. In essence, SD Dems SHOULD BE experts on radical conservatism, but they currently do not want to be, and so they are not.

    What’s happened in SD is how Nazi culture took over Germany, and it’s only delusional to think that civilized people should have tried harder to draw more common ground with the Nazi Party and culture in order to save the world from Hitler’s wrath. Having a backbone does NOT mean maintaining a steadfast willingness to draw common ground with people who have gone off the rails.

    I don’t think we should send all our money and talent elsewhere. I do think SD Dems need to study up on political theater, and quit thinking all politics is local while 2/3 of SD voters only vote based on Limbaugh, Coulter, Breitbart, and Fox News national messaging.

    This blog is very important, and I think it could do even more good if it focused more on the dysfunctional character and absence of integrity within 2/3 of SD voters and also if it reach more people outside of SD.

    Notice how conserva-trolls continually criticize anyone outside of SD for commenting on a blog post? This is because they are truly paranoid of outsiders knowing/seeing who they really are – way deep down inside. It’s their soft/weak spot, and it needs to get punched and stabbed.

    Slowly but surely, America’s patience is running out with these dirty ignorant animals. It’s time for rural state Dems to take a legitimate STRONG stand against the radicalism which saturates their environment and that means diagnosing what has caused 2/3 of SD to become anti-government obsessed nutbags.

    The strong majority of South Dakota is far more suited for a Vladimir Putin regime than democracy in the United States of America, and saying that is not political theater, it’s a fact, AND THEY NEED TO HEAR IT – for the good of our nation – over and over and over again !!!

  8. 96Tears

    Mr. Claussen’s writing style is interesting. It’s extremely rare to find someone who starts sentences with the term, “Fore,” especially in this era of texting and social media.

    About 90 percent of what he said above is on the mark and displays a competent understanding of campaigns and the party structure. He should break it down into two sections using bullet points. One section deals with why the party is where it is today. The other is how and when does the party gain relevance/effectiveness and starts growing instead of shrinking.

    Whoever wins, the new chair needs to frankly assess resources and match them up with her/his goals. It would do well to assess the dying demographic of Democrats in South Dakota, and who is registering as independents and the blunt answer why. Were they disaffected Democrats or Republicans? Why do they vote? What issues do they respond to?

    I’ve grown to appreciate the articles in print and on his blog that veteran Pierre newswriter Bob Mercer has done on the fading Democrat demographic in South Dakota. The people who elected George McGovern, Ralph and Stephanie Herseth, Dick Kneip, Jim Abourezk, Frank Denholm, Tom Daschle and Tim Johnson, plus several PUC members, were largely Greatest Generation voters. They were the Middle Class built by the New Deal and they remembered how little Republicans cared about “the little guy” on the farm or at a job in town. They remembered when rural electric cooperatives made electricity possible in most of South Dakota and created farm programs that kept families on their land and small town businesses in the black back when a greater portion of the population lived on farms and ranches.

    The Republican Party hasn’t done anything new except to stay the course as the party of the rich and well-connected in South Dakota. They’ve been successful in keeping membership in the party meaningful at some level. Keeping their focus on Pierre, they’ve kept their identity and their politics localized. It’s a status thing with Baby Boomers, who will also soon enough become a fading demographic. When you spend time talking with them, you find out that the reason most Republicans vote that way is because their parents were Republicans. Twenty or 30 years ago if you asked their parents why they are Republicans, you’d get the same answer that the brand loyalty is multi-generational. While that answer explains why voters just automatically ignore Democrat candidates and vote Republican, it is not a very compelling reason. It can be shaken loose if Democrats find ways to be more relevant in daily life.

    The Sutton campaign showed us that if people are given good reasons to support a Democrat for an important office, Democrats can shake that GOP grip loose. With new generations of voters coming up, I don’t think the “I vote Republican because my daddy does” explanation is going to serve the GOP brand. I gather from his message here, Claussen understands this potential.

    If he wants to win over his opposition next month, Claussen needs to answer the question on the minds of the central committee members “what’s in it for me?” and be very direct with what he expects them to do. This looks like a thankless job, but good luck JKC.

  9. Debbo

    Adam said, “Having a backbone does NOT mean maintaining a steadfast willingness to draw common ground with people who have gone off the rails.”

    Exactly. SD Dems must stand for Democratic principles.

  10. leslie

    Adam. Great! 96, as reminded at party meetings, that’s “Democratic” demographic. Republican messeging is insidious and dilutes decades of AP English teachers. (Sigh)

Comments are closed.