Skip to content

Trump Wants Lowest Refugee Cap Ever, Authorizes Noem and Schaunaman to Ban Refugees

War, famine, and other turmoil have driven 25 million people from their homelands… and the richest nation in the world contends it can’t take in even one out of a thousand of those poor souls:

The Trump administration intends to set the refugee admissions goal for next fiscal year at 18,000– the lowest level in U.S. history, and released a new executive order that permits state and local officials to block resettlement in their communities. Last year, the administration set an historically low refugee admissions goal at 30,000 – in the face of the worst refugee crisis in global history. For nearly four decades, the annual goal has averaged 95,000 refugees. Today, there are more than 25 million refugees worldwide — more than half of whom are children. Refugees are more than just a global figure; they are families torn apart, children who have witnessed profound violence and people seeking a chance to rebuild their lives and raise a family in safety.

As people who care about refugees, we must make our voices heard and tell both the White House and Congress that the new record-low refugee admissions goal is morally bankrupt. We must return refugee admissions to historic norms and set a refugee admissions goal of 95,000. One way Members of Congress can show their support is by co-sponsoring the GRACE Act (H.R.2146, S.1088), which would set the minimum annual refugee admissions goal at 95,000 and ensure greater accountability [Church World Service, press release, 2019.09.26].

Did you catch that Executive Order? We’ve been able to fight anti-refugee bills from local racists like Al Novstrup and Neal Tapio by pointing out that states have no Constitutional authority to intrude on the federal business of immigration. But now the racist in the White House has ordered the proper federal autorities to resettle refugees only in communities where the state and local governments have authorized refugee resettlement. In other words, one racist Governor or one racist mayor can declare their jurisdictions off limits to people from foreign lands in need of America’s protection.

But what good South Dakota Christian would ever do a mean thing like that?

17 Comments

  1. Donna Baggett

    As long as there are hungry, cold homeless Americans we DO NOT NEED OR WANT REFUGEES

  2. We plan at illegals 15.00 an hour and we get 9.10 how is this fair. They get free health care we don’t. How is this fair.

  3. Janet, my understanding is that we pay the wages the market will bear. Do you have evidence that all undocumented workers get higher wages than minimum wage?

  4. Donna apparently believes America is too weak to help its own people and others. Sad to see such a lack of faith in America’s capacity to do great things.

    Admitting refugees will help feed people, since refugees will boost our economy, create jobs, pay taxes….

  5. bearcreekbat

    I suspect Donna knows better than that, Cory. More likely she is trying to assuage the natural guilt she, as a human being, experiences when supporting hateful, discriminatory attitudes toward people in need. She is using the fallacy of relative privation.

    . . . [N]othing matters if it’s not literally the worst thing happening. It’s popular with people who know perfectly well they’re doing something wrong. Since they are fully aware that they’re doing something wrong, they feel compelled to attempt to justify it and do so by pointing to other (usually worse) actions.

    https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_as_bad_as

    Helping people in need is not a zero sum game in the USA. We have the resources to help refugees in addition whatever other groups we help, especially hungry, homeless people who were lucky enough through no fault of their own to have been born in the US. Most likely, Donna knows she is a much better person than someoine who would normally advocate turning her back on someone in need (as evidenced by her acknowledgment that the homeless deserve compassion).

    A genuine hater would simply declare that refugees are
    ‘illegals” that are less than human and deserve to die – you know, sort of like Trump with his recent comments about snakes, alligators, shooting people, flesh piercing spikes. and an electrified wall, all designed to kill or maim refugees.

  6. Debbo

    The disciples told the kids to get lost and quit bothering Jesus. Jesus said the disciples, or anyone else for that matter, who treated children badly should be drowned. Jesus didn’t say anything about where the children were from, their skin color, clothing, customs or income. I guess none of that was relevant.

    The disciples jumped on Jesus for talking to the wrong person because she was a woman and a Samaritan, not one of them. Jesus didn’t care for their comments, nor stop ministering to her.

    I think there’s a reason those stories are in the Gospels of Jesus Christ. Of course, if Donna and Janet are not Christians, there is no reason these 2 stories matter to them.

  7. clara hart

    Both Donna Bagget and Janet Luther I take it you do not understand what refugee resettlement or has never met one. In which case, I would give you a tour of the office. If you have not helped at the Banquet, this is the time ladies.

  8. Donna Baggett

    Search Results
    Phrases.org.UK › uk › meanings › c…
    Web results
    ‘Charity begins at home’ – the meaning and origin of this phrase
    What’s the origin of the phrase ‘Charity begins at home’? The notion that a man’s family should be his foremost concern is expressed in 1 Timothy 5:8, King James Bible, 1611: But if any provide not for his owne, & specially for those of his owne house, hee hath denied the faith, and is worse then an infidel.
    PEOPLE ALSO ASK
    Where does the saying Charity starts at home come from?
    Is there a scripture that says charity begins at home?
    What is the meaning of the phrase charity begins at home?
    What is charity all about?
    Feedback
    https://www.abc.net.au › 2013/05/03
    Web results
    Charity begins at home or does it? – ABC Goulburn Murray – Australian …
    May 3, 2013 · “When people say ‘Charity begins at home’ they very often mean ‘You should look after your own kids, family and own circle first and then be kind to people’ which is not the original meaning of the proverb. The original meaning is that charity begins in the home – that is to say kids learn charity in the home.”
    Catholic Stand › the-misused-charity…
    The Misused Charity Proverb – Catholic Stand
    Jul 18, 2014 · “Charity begins at home” is a common proverb, although not … If our children do not see their parents and extended …
    https://dictionary.cambridge.org › …
    CHARITY BEGINS AT HOME | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
    In times of crisis, it is natural that many people would say that charity begins at home. From Europarl Parallel Corpus – English.
    https://serudsindia.org › charity-…
    What Does Charity Begins at Home Means? | History & explanation |
    Aug 8, 2018 · We always hear the phrase ‘Charity Begins at Home’ and we take it as a regular proverb or quote. But if we …
    The Free Dictionary › idioms › char…
    Charity begins at home – Idioms by The Free Dictionary – Idioms and phrases
    Definition of charity begins at home in the Idioms Dictionary. charity begins at home phrase. What does charity begins at home …
    https://naturalpapa.com › family › c…
    What “Charity Begins at Home” Really Means – Natural Papa
    Jun 2, 2016 · Many people interpret the idea of “charity begins at home” to mean … But how do you teach children to be charitable?
    Collins Dictionary › dictionary
    Charity begins at home definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
    If you say charity begins at home, you mean that people should deal with the needs of people close to them before they think …
    https://melindacousins.com › ca…
    Can we please stop saying “Charity begins at home”? | Thinking Out Loud …
    Jan 29, 2014 · Is it just me, or do the people who say “Charity begins at home” usually seem to be implying that they think it …
    bibleornot.org › who-said-charity-b…
    Who Said Charity Begins at Home? – Bible or Not
    Apr 24, 2010 · Charity begins at home, is the voice of the world; Bible, … But you may say that “charity” and “piety” do not mean the …

  9. Donna’s ability to Google somehow fails to address the Christian point: the Samaritan didn’t ask for ID. Jesus didn’t ask for a passport before he started helping people. How do Christians surrounded by wealth justify not helping those in need from other lands?

    Donald Trump isn’t following any Christian imperative: at the same time he’s shutting out refugees, he keeps trying to cut food assistance to American citizens.

  10. mike from iowa

    Charity begins at home….. rich homes. For theyn alone have the necessary amounts of free speech dinero to buy alleged kristian congressweasels to ensure charity comes to those most deserving…. the wealthiest of the wealthy.

    That is wingnut kristian gospel in what used to be America.

  11. bearcreekbat

    Another issue raised by Donna’s “charity begins at home” is the meaning of “home.” Does that mean no one living outside your physical walls deserves charity? Or does it mean no one living outside your town, county, state, nation, continent, world, solar system, or universe deserves charity? One’s “home” can legitimately be defined as any of these physical locations.

    Donna’s suggestion that hunger and homeless “Americans” deserve help (which they definitely do) implies that she seeks to define “home” as the USA, although none of her biblical quotations seem to support that arbitrary determination. The link referencing home as the “voice of the world” seems to offer more support for helping refugees if one needs biblical justification to help a fellow human being, or that person’s child, who is in need but resides outside one’s “home,” in whatever way it may be defined.

    Likewise, while the links Donna references make clear the mandate that charity should be provided to “his owne, & specially for those of his owne house,” the links certainly do not imply either a mandate, nor even offer an excuse, for denying that help to people beyond one’s “owne house.”
    Indeed, the repeated use of the modifier “begins” in the various quotes makes it crystal clear that charity ought to be provided to individuals both inside and outside one’s “owne house.”

  12. Donna Baggett

    Wow..you guys are really something else…LOL You hate facts because you are so needy..Needing a pat on the back much? Some of us actually see thru the BS…

  13. Debbo

    Donna, I referred to the words of Jesus Christ Himself, not a colloquial saying. Christ is the cornerstone of “Christ”ianity. The beginning, the end, the center. It’s easy to find text in the bible to say anything. I prefer to look to the words of Jesus for the first and last word. All else is secondary to him. Wouldn’t you agree?

  14. mike from iowa

    If I remember my history correctly, the highly questionable bible was allegedly written long before there was an America to reside in. So it can’t pertain to charity in America. Now wingnuts have carte blanche to lavish treasure on the wealthy.

  15. Debbo

    Donna, don’t forget the Good Samaritan too.

    A lawyer was trying to weasel out of having to care for or about others, so he tried to get Jesus to narrow down the “neighbor” field. Jesus responded with the Good Samaritan story.

    We are to care for our neighbor, and that is anyone who is in need. Anyone, even if the religious leadership turns their back on that needy person and walks away. From Jesus’ mouth to the faithful Christian’s ears. There is no wiggle room.

  16. jerry

    Melania and her kid are refugees, shall we give them the boot Donna Baggett? Ivana as well along with her brood. What do we really know about you Donna Baggett? Is Baggett your married name or is it on the list of bad hombres? The wheel that squeaks the loudest is usually the one with the most issue.

Comments are closed.