Press "Enter" to skip to content

Seiler Willing to Debate for Attorney General Position

Offer a debate, and inexperienced Jason Ravnsborg says, “Bawk bawk!

Experienced prosecutor Randy Seiler says, “Bring it on“:

Remind me: don’t attorneys general usually have to engage in lots of debates on behalf of South Dakota, writing well-evidenced briefs and appearing in person in court to persuade judges to do what’s right for the state? So isn’t it arguably even more important for attorney general candidates to debate publicly in order to demonstrate to the voters their qualifications for a core function of the job they are seeking?

2 Comments

  1. grudznick 2018-09-09 21:08

    Mr. Ravnsborg will chicken out, as he cannot debate a monkey with a scrabble board. Mr. Ravsnborg is very, very scared that his ineptitude will be exposed to the masses. And the powers of the GOP are very, very scared that they messed up very, very badly. This will all likely result in having these downticket fellows like the AG and SOS elected in a primary, not by the crazies and jobless hangers-on at the conventions.

    Don’t get to smarmy just yet, libbies, your convention threw a bunch of total losers out there. Mr. Seiler, aside, of course. grudznick urges all to vote for Mr. Seiler.

  2. Debbo 2018-09-10 00:09

    Rvnsbg:

    🐔🐓🐣🐤🐥🐔🐓🐣🐤🐥🐔🐓🐣🐤🐥

Comments are closed.